Correlation analysis reveals that umbilical cord diameter and farrowing duration affect the reproductive performance of sows
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajas.v56i02.03Keywords:
faecal score, farrowing interval, parity, umbilical artery diameter, umbilical cord veinAbstract
This study evaluated the relationships between sow parity, prepartum faecal score, farrowing and umbilical cord traits, and reproductive performance. Data were obtained from sows of different parities on commercial farms with records of litter characteristics, farrowing intervals and duration, prepartum faecal scores, and umbilical cord artery and vein diameters. Fourth- and sixth-parity sows produced more total piglets and live-born healthy piglets than first-parity sows, while piglets born to second- to fourth-parity sows had higher live birthweights. Parity did not influence the number of piglets born weak or perinatal mortality rates. Faecal scores of 3.00–3.99 and >4.00 three days prepartum were associated with increased numbers of healthy piglets and reduced numbers of stillborn piglets. Short farrowing intervals (<10 minutes) were numerically associated with higher numbers of live-born piglets and fewer stillborn piglets per litter, although these differences were not statistically significant, and a tendency towards an increased number of piglets born weak was observed. Prolonged farrowing duration was associated with increased perinatal mortality. A higher umbilical cord vein diameter was associated with increased live birthweights and fewer piglets born weak, whereas umbilical artery diameter showed no clear association with reproductive performance. Stillbirths tended to increase with umbilical cord vein diameters of 3.6–4.0 mm. These results indicate that sow parity, prepartum faecal score, farrowing traits, and umbilical cord vein traits are closely associated with reproductive outcomes and perinatal mortality. Optimising gastrointestinal function during the prepartum period and improving farrowing management may contribute to enhanced piglet viability and birthweight.
(Submitted 27 June 2023; Accepted 10 February 2026; Published 23 February 2026)
References
Alonso-Spilsbury, M., Mota-Rojas, D., Villanueva-García, D., Martínez-Burnes, J., Orozco, H., Ramírez-Necoechea, R., Mayagoitia, A.L., & Trujillo, M.E., 2005. Perinatal asphyxia pathophysiology in pig and human: a review. Animal Reproduction Science, 90:1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.007
Björkman, S., Oliviero, C., Kauffold, J., Soede, N.M., & Peltoniemi, O.A.T., 2018. Prolonged parturition and impaired placenta expulsion increase the risk of postpartum metritis and delay uterine involution in sows. Theriogenology, 106:87–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.003
Björkman, S., Oliviero, C., Rajala-Schultz, P.J., Soede, N.M., & Peltoniemi, O.A.T., 2017. The effect of litter size, parity and farrowing duration on placenta expulsion and retention in sows. Theriogenology, 92:36–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.01.003
Cechova, M. & Cechova, Z., 2006. Relationships between backfat thickness and parameters of reproduction in the Czech Large White sows. Archives of Animal Breeding, 49:363–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-49-363-2006
Cong, G.L., Xia, S.S., Liu, C.X., Yu, F.Y., Yu, H.J., Zhang, F., & Dai, Y.J., 2022. Research progress on the effects of dietary fibre regulating gut microbiota on sows’ reproductive performance. Agricultural Biotechnology, 11:89–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19759/j.cnki.2164-4993.2022.06.001
Cong, G.L., Xia, S.S., Liu, C.X., Li, J.B., & Hung, I., 2024. Effects of guanidine acetic acid supplementation from gestation to lactation on reproductive performance, colostrum quality, blood biochemistry, and intestinal microflora diversity of sows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11:1476328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1476328
Cowart, R.P., 2007. Parturition and dystocia in swine. In: Large Animal Theriogenology. Eds: Youngquist, R.S. & Threlfall, W.R., Saunders, St. Louis, MI, USA, pp. 778–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-072169323-1.50106-9
Gourley, K.M., Calderon, H.I., Woodworth, J.C., DeRouchey, J.M., Tokach, M.D., Dritz, S.S., & Goodband, R.D., 2020. Sow and piglet traits associated with piglet survival at birth and to weaning. Journal of Animal Science, 98:1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa187
Hagan, J.K. & Etim, N.N., 2019. The effects of breed, season and parity on the reproductive performance of pigs reared under hot and humid environments. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51:411–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1705-5
Hoving, L.L., Soede, N.M., Graat, E.A.M., Feitsma, H., & Kemp, B., 2012. Reproductive performance of second parity sows: relations with subsequent reproduction. Livestock Science, 140:124–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.02.019
Jiarpinitnun, P., Loyawatananan, S., Sangratkanjanasin, P., Kompong, K., Nuntapaitoon, M., Muns, R., De Rensis, F., & Tummaruk, P., 2019. Administration of carbetocin after the first piglet was born reduced farrowing duration but compromised colostrum intake in newborn piglets. Theriogenology, 128:23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.021
Kim, J.S., Yang, X.J., Pangeni, D., & Baidoo, S.K., 2015. Relationship between backfat thickness of sows during late gestation and reproductive efficiency at different parities. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 65:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2015.1045932
Klimas, R., Klimiene, A., Sobotka, W., & Matusevicius, P., 2020. Effect of parity on reproductive performance of sows of different breeds. South African Journal of Animal Science, 50:434–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v50i3.10
Knecht, D., Srodon, S., & Duzinski, K., 2015. The impact of season, parity and breed on selected reproductive performance parameters of sows. Archives of Animal Breeding, 58:49–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-49-2015
Maes, D.G.D., Janssens, G.P.J., Delputte, P., Lammertyn, A., & De Kruif, A., 2004. Back fat measurements in sows from three commercial pig herds: relationship with reproductive efficiency and correlation with visual body condition scores. Livestock Production Science, 91:57–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.06.015
Oliviero, C., Heinonen, M., Valros, A., & Peltoniemi, O., 2010. Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing. Animal Reproduction Science, 119:85–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.009
Peltoniemi, O., Oliviero, C., Yun, J., Grahofer, A., & Björkman, S., 2020. Management practices to optimize the parturition process in the hyperprolific sow. Journal of Animal Science, 98:S96–S106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa140
Randall, G.C., 1972. Observations on parturition in the sow. II. Factors influencing stillbirth and perinatal mortality. Veterinary Record, 90:183–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.90.7.183
Tabeling, R., Schwier, S., & Kamphues, J., 2003. Effects of different feeding and housing conditions on dry matter content and consistency of faeces in sows. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 87:116–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2003.00423.x
Tan, C.Q., Wei, H.K., Sun, H.Q., Long, G., Ao, J.T., Jiang, S.W., & Peng, J., 2015. Effects of supplementing sow diets during two gestations with konjac flour and Saccharomyces boulardii on constipation in the peripartal period, lactation feed intake and piglet performance. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 210:254–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.10.013
Thongkhuy, S., Chuaychu, S.B., Burarnrak, P., Ruangjoy, P., Juthamanee, P., Nuntapaitoon, M., & Tummaruk, P., 2020. Effect of backfat thickness during late gestation on farrowing duration, piglet birth weight, colostrum yield, milk yield and reproductive performance of sows. Livestock Science, 234:103983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103983
Tummaruk, P., 2013. Post-parturient disorders and backfat loss in tropical sows in relation to backfat thickness before farrowing and postpartum intravenous supportive treatment. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26:171–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12478
Tummaruk, P. & Pearodwong, P., 2015. Postparturient disorders and backfat loss in tropical sows associated with parity, farrowing duration and type of antibiotic. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 47:1457–1464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0883-7
Tummaruk, P. & Sang-Gassanee, K., 2013. Effect of farrowing duration, parity number and the type of anti-inflammatory drug on postparturient disorders in sows: a clinical study. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45:1071–1077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0315-x
Van Den Bosch, M., Soede, N., Kemp, B., & Van Den Brand, H., 2023. Sow nutrition, uterine contractions, and placental blood flow during the peri-partum period and short-term effects on offspring: a review. Animals, 13:1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050910
Van Rens, B.T. & Van Der Lende, T., 2004. Parturition in gilts: duration of farrowing, birth intervals and placenta expulsion in relation to maternal, piglet and placental traits. Theriogenology, 62:331–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.10.008
Ye, J., Tan, C., Hu, X.X., Wang, A.G., & Wu, Z.F., 2018. Genetic parameters for reproductive traits at different parities in Large White pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 96:1215–1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky066
Zhou, Y.F., Xu, T., Cai, A.L., Wu, Y.H., Wei, H.K., Jiang, S.W., & Peng, J., 2018. Excessive backfat of sows at 109 days of gestation induces a lipotoxic placental environment and is associated with declining reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science, 96:250–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx041
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 G.L. Cong, C.X. Liu, S.S. Xia, J.B. Li, H.J. Yu, B. Zhao (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 163
- PDF 68
