Phenotypic characterisation of four naked neck chicken ecotypes indigenous to Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajas.v55i4.04Keywords:
circumference, indigenous poultry, morphometric, qualitative, quantitativeAbstract
This study characterised four naked neck chicken phenotypes (black, white-and-black, light brown, and dark brown) at 20 weeks of age, based on both qualitative and quantitative traits. A total of 320 birds were evaluated, with 40 males and 40 females per phenotype. Qualitative traits assessed included head shape, comb type, wattle size, plumage pattern, shank colour, spur presence, and number of toes. Quantitative traits measured included neck length, keel length, wingspan, shank length, shank circumference, drumstick length, drumstick circumference, and body length. Both sexes of all phenotypes exhibited a plain head and a single comb. Wattle size varied by sex, being medium-sized in females and highly developed in males. Feathers in the breast, wing bow, wing bar, wing bay, saddle, and tail areas most commonly had a plain pattern, followed by stippled, pencilled, and laced patterns. Shank colouration differed between the sexes, with males most commonly having yellow shanks, followed by grey, off-white, and green shanks. In contrast, females predominantly had grey shanks, followed by yellow, green, and off-white shanks. Among the phenotypes, white-and-black, light brown, and dark brown chickens exhibited the highest frequency of yellow shanks, while grey shanks were most commonly found in black birds. Males were significantly larger than females for most morphometric traits. Additionally, the light brown and dark brown phenotypes exhibited higher values for quantitative traits than the black and white-and-black phenotypes. All birds of the naked neck phenotype, regardless of sex, had four toes, normal spurs, and tufted feathers on the ventral neck region above the crop.
Submitted 23 September 2021; Accepted 8 April 2025; Published April 2025
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Significance of research to South African science
The article by Shafiq et al. (2025) provides valuable insights for South African poultry science and sustainable livestock development in similar agroecological zones. Although based in Nigeria, the study evaluates key phenotypic traits - such as body weight, growth rate, and heat tolerance - of naked neck chickens under heat-stress conditions, which are increasingly relevant due to climate change. For South Africa, where smallholder and rural poultry systems remain important for food security and livelihoods, the findings support breed selection strategies that prioritise adaptability, resilience, and productivity in hot climates. This research contributes to regional efforts in promoting climate-smart animal agriculture and preserving indigenous genetic resources.
References
Ahmed, S., Begum, M., Khatun, A., Gofur, M.R., Azad, M.T., Kabir, A., & Haque, T.S., 2021. Family Poultry (FP) as a tool for improving gender equity and women’s empowerment in developing countries: evidence from Bangladesh. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 3(2):37–44. DOI: 10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.2.251
Aklilu, E., Kebede, K., Dessie, T., & Banerjee, A.K., 2013. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken population in Ethiopia. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(1):24–32.
Al-Rawi, A.A. & Al-Athari, A.K., 2002. Characteristics of indigenous chicken in Iraq. Animal Genetic Resources, 32:87–93. DOI: 10.1017/S1014233900001589
Alwell, J.J.S., Abdur-Rahman, A., & Chukwujindu, N.S., 2018. Genetic characterization of local chickens population based on their quantitative traits in the tropics, Nigeria. SPC Journal of Agricultural Science, 1(1):1–5. DOI: 10.14419/ijamr.v1i1.9971
Amexo, V.E., Adomako, K., & Ato-Agan, J., 2022. Phenotypic characterisation of local-exotic naked neck crossbred and normal feathered chicken population. Ghanian Journal of Animal Science, 13(1):1–12.
Assefa, H. & Melesse, A., 2018. Morphological and morphometric characterization of indigenous chicken populations in Sheka Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Poultry, Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, 6(2):200. DOI: 10.4172/2375-446X.1000200
Banerjee, S. 2012. Morphological characterization of indigenous chickens of Sikkim and West Bengal, India. Animal Genetic Resources, 51:57–71. DOI: 10.1017/S2078633612000343
Cabarles Jr, J., Lambio, C., Vega, A.L., Captain, S.A., & Mendioro, M.S., 2012. Distinct morphological traits in Iranian native fowls. MSc thesis, Mazandaran University, Bablosar, Iran.
Crawford, R.D., 1984. Assessment and conservation of animal genetic resources in Canada. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 64(2):235–251. DOI: 10.4141/cjas84-031
Dana, N., Dessie, T., Van der Waaij, L.H., & van Arendonk, J.A., 2010. Morphological features of indigenous chicken populations of Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Resources, 46:11–23. DOI: 10.1017/S2078633610000652
Delany, M.E., 2006. Avian genetic stocks: The high and low points from an academia researcher. Poultry Science, 85(2):223–226. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.2.223
Dorji, N. & Sunar, S.K., 2014. Morphometric variations among five Bhutanese indigenous chickens (Gallus domesticus). Journal of Animal and Poultry Science, 3(3):76–85.
Everett, C., 2010. Asils in the United States. Society for the Preservation of Poultry Antiquities (SPPA) Bulletin, 15:3–4.
Fadare, A.O., 2014. Morpho-metric and growth Performance variations of Naked-Neck, Frizzled feathered and normal feathered crosses with exotic Giri-Raja chickens. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(4):811–820
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2012. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. In: FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 11. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Faruque, S., Siddiquee, N.U., Afroz, M.A., & Islam, M.S., 2010. Phenotypic characterization of native chicken reared under intensive management system. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 8(1):79–82. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208468
Fayeye, T.R., Hagan, J.K., & Obadare, A.R., 2014. Morphometric traits and correlation between body weight and body size traits in Isa brown and Ilorin ecotype chickens. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4(3):609–614.
Fulton, J.E., 2006. Avian genetic stock preservation: An industry perspective. Poultry Science, 85(2):227–231. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.2.227
Gonzalez Ariza, A., Arando Arbulu, A., Navas Gonzalez, F.J., Nogales Baena, S., Delgado Bermejo, J.V., & Camacho Vallejo, M.E., 2021. The study of growth and performance in local chicken breeds and varieties: A review of methods and scientific transference. Animals, 11(9):2492. DOI: 10.3390/ani11092492
Guni, F.S. & Katule, A.M., 2013. Characterization of local chickens in selected districts of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: I. Qualitative characters. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 25(9):153.
Hamid, M.A., 2019. Chicken germplasms and their conservation in Bangladesh: a review. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 17(1):119–134. DOI: 10.3329/sja.v17i1.42766
Iqbal, A., Ali, A., Javed, K., Akram, M., Usman, M., Mehmood, S., Hussain, J., & Hussnain, F., 2015. Phenotypic characterization of two indigenous chicken ecotypes of Pakistan. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 25(2):346–350.
Kaleri, R.R., Kaleri, H.A., Kalhoro, N.H., Mangi, R.A., Solangi, G.M., Bhuptani, D.K., Khosa, S.M., Solangi, A.W., Lashari, A.A., & Dari, S., 2023. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous backyard poultry birds in Tando Allahayar, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 36(2):135–141. DOI: 10.17582/journal.pjar/2023/36.2.135.141
Kumar, M., Dahiya, S.P., & Ratwan, P., 2021. Backyard poultry farming in India: A tool for nutritional security and women empowerment. Biological Rhythm Research, 52(10):1476–1491. DOI: 10.1080/09291016.2019.1628396
Liswaniso, S., Qin, N., Shan, X., Sun, X., & Xu, R., 2023. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous free range chickens in Kalomo, Zambia. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 33(3):655–665. DOI: 10.36899/JAPS.2023.3.0658
Liyanage, R.P., Dematawewa, C.M.B. & Silva, G.L.L.P., 2015. Comparative study on morphological and morphometric features of village chicken in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research, 26:261–273. DOI: 10.4038/tar.v26i2.8090
Magothe, T.M., Okeno, T.O., Muhuyi, W.B., & Kahi, A.K., 2012a. Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: I. Current status. World's Poultry Science Journal, 68(1):119–132. DOI: 10.1017/S0043933912000128
Magothe, T.M., Okeno, T.O., Muhuyi, W.B., & Kahi, A.K., 2012b. Indigenous chicken production in Kenya: II. Prospects for research and development. World's Poultry Science Journal, 68(1):133–144. DOI: 10.1017/S004393391200013X
Mangesha, M. & Tsega, W., 2011. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of indigenous chickens in Ethiopia: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(24):5398–5404. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.434
Manyelo, T.G., Selaledi, L., Hassan, Z.M., & Mabelebele, M., 2020. Local chicken breeds of Africa: their description, uses and conservation methods. Animals, 10(12):2257. DOI: 10.3390/ani10122257
Mwacharo, J.M., Nomura, K., Hanada, H., Jianlin, H., Hanotte, O., & Amano, T., 2007. Genetic relationships among Kenyan and other East African indigenous chickens. Animal Genetics, 38(5):485–490. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01641.x
Olawunmi, O.O., Salako, A.E., & Afuwape, A.A., 2008. Morphometric differentiation and assessment of function of the Fulani and Yoruba ecotype indigenous chickens of Nigeria. International Journal of Morphology, 26(4):975–980.
Onasanya, G.O., Ikeobi, C.O., & Amusan, S.A., 2018. Morphostructural profiling of comb types and plumage pigmentation and their influences on ecometric traits of extensively-managed Nigerian indigenous chickens. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 1(2):10–17.
Petrus, N.P., 2011. Characterisation and production performance of indigenous chickens in Northern Namibia regions. PhD thesis, University of Namibia, Namibia.
Roberts, V., 2008. British Poultry Standards, 6th edition. Blackwell Publishing, UK.
Rogelio Jr, V.L., Lambio, A.L., Vega, R.S., & De Guia, A.P.O., 2013. Phenotypic characterization of native chicken in Palawan, Philippines. Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 39(2):147–156.
Sarker, M.J.A., Bhuiyan, M.S.A., Faruque, M.O., Ali, M.A., & Lee, J.H., 2012. Phenotypic characterization of Aseel chicken of Bangladesh. Korean Journal of Poultry Science, 39(1):9–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.1.009
SAS Institute Inc., 2002-03. SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Scherf, B.D., 1994. Developing the global inventory for poultry genetic resources. In: Proceedings of the Third Global Conference on Conservation of Domestic Animal Genetic Resources. Queens University, Canada. pp. 81–93.
Tadele, A., Melesse, A., & Taye, M., 2018. Phenotypic and morphological characterizations of indigenous chicken populations in Kaffa Zone, South-Western Ethiopia. Animal Husbandry, Dairy and Veterinary Science, 2(1):1–9.
Tenza, T., Mhlongo, L.C., Ncobela, C.N., & Rani, Z., 2024. Village chickens for achieving sustainable development goals 1 and 2 in resource-poor communities: A literature review. Agriculture, 14(8):1264. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14081264
Udeh, I. & Ogbu, C.C., 2011. Principal component analysis of body measurements in three strains of broiler chicken. Science World Journal, 6(2):11–14.
Woelders, H., Zuidberg, C.A., & Hiemstra, S.J., 2006. Animal genetic resources conservation in the Netherlands and Europe: poultry perspective. Poultry Science, 85(2):216–222. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.2.216
Yakubu, A., Kuje, D., & Okpeku, M., 2009. Principal components as measures of size and shape in Nigerian indigenous chickens. Thai Journal of Agricultural Science, 42(3):167–176.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M Shafiq, A Ahmad, H Khaliq, ZM Iqbal, B Siddique, MI Ullah, MF Khalid, F Ali, MT Khan, S Aslam, R Mustafa, U Farooq, S Mehmood, J Hussain, Z Li (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
- Abstract 225
- PDF 81

